How Could LoonWatch.com Spin This Possible Hate Crime?

When was the last time a certain Robert Spencer or Daniel Pipes, the latest target of LoonWatch.com ever declared it was okay to go beat up average Muslims?  Even a Muslim who was possibly an allege terror suspect?  That’s what these two men are charged with a likely hate crime indeed.

Please, when was the last time Spencer or Pipes, or Pamela Gella ever acted like neo-Nazis and encouraged violence upon average Muslims?  Please, could the loons from LoonWatch.com or possibly their ally Charles Johnson care to mention?  When was the last time they encouraged something like what the two men are charged with doing?

Would LoonWatch.com Condemn The Pie Attempt Against Robert Spencer?

Would LoonWatch.com ever condemn the assault by pie attempt at Robert Spencer?

Do they have any responsibility of their own to say they’re sorry for this demonization in going after any critics of radical Islam to be Islamophobes?

Nidal Hasan…No Fan Of Separation Of Church And State

He literally promotes it in his slideshow. Scroll a few pages, after it finishes loading.  It’s quite odd how LoonWatch.com likes to bash extremists whom happen to be non-Muslims stating similar things, but they do not criticize so much extremists whom happen to be Muslims.

I guess that’s why they prefer in an Animal Farm-like manner, some crazies are more equal than others and it’s fine to always bash Christianity.  But when anti-Jihad bloggers criticize Islam in a similar manner, they’re “Islamophobes” right, but okay for them to generalize about Christians?

LoonWatch.com Proves Its Readers Are Anti-Christian

On obviously trying to suggest that there is an obvious “Christian conspiracy” over drug smuggling. Even though it seems every radical group no matter their affiliation seems to enjoy doing it.

Don’t tell that to the user known as “Snarla” that:

“Severed heads?! I think that automatically makes the Muslim. Fox News would no doubt switch the (C) after their names to (M), if Christian and Muslim were political parties and Fox News would ever report anything negative about a Christian group. In my imagination, I mean.”

Really, how idiotic and loony does Snarla sound here? Of course even a major news network like FOXNews or other news networks would report it dummy.  It’s quite obvious also, the loons of LoonWatch.com are no fans of FOXNews either.

“Widespread” Islamophobia, The Fort Hood Gunman’s Main Primary Motive

Now so typical here that LoonWatch.com has finally come out to suggest it sends its condolances to the victims of the Fort Hood massacre.  But wait…they are following an example which the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) have been following into trying to suggest there should not be any need to push any alarmist feelings of there being widespread Islamophobia.

Wait a second?  Who’s the one who’s been crying wolf here?  Last time one checked, it was LoonWatch.com and other Leftist sites affiliated with it or connectted with it that were spreading lies into trying to suggest how American Muslims/Arabs were being treated like second class citizens.  Something what the gunman was radicalized into literally believing, making it more evident he’d go on a rampage like this.  But wait!  There is no obvious widespread Islamophobia whatsoever.

Seriously, when ALL American Muslims/Arabs start seeing their property seized by the local law enforcement like what Japanese-Americans have, and placed in interment camps THEN I’d start believing you.  But since that isn’t really happening, why the hype of the fear of Islamophobia?  The pure reason why the far left promotes the hype of Islamophobia is to promtoe a divide between American Muslims/Arabs into making them believe that they ARE being lowered to the level of second class citizens.  Why should a Muslim American/Arab be upset over terms such as “Muslim terrorist”, “Islamo-Fascist” and other terms like that?

There are similar terms being used against Christian fundelmentalists when it warrents it, but you don’t see that many Christians being this upset.  Now certainly, is this a case of crying wolf here?

LoonWatch.com Loons Being Silent Over Recent Shooting In Texas?

Why the long faces of silence LoonWatch.com?  One wonders if it seems the Left’s push and crying wolf over Islamophobia has certainly led to radicalize Muslim Americans to literally make them believe their own government is out to literally get them.

Apparently, these Leftists haven’t read history.  Japanese-Americans during World War II had their own property being taken away, placed in internment camps and also other Asians were also put on the same level as being second class citizens, though they didn’t have their property being taken away or being put in internment camps.  They were likely stereotyped because they were different.

But here, here it seems it’s obviously the other way around here.  Leftists like those from the loons of LoonWatch.com don’t seem to care to hype about there being obvious Islamophobia, making many Muslim Americans believe that even one hint of criticism of Islam you’re an Islamophobe.  Even while the same hypocrites get to criticize Christianity in the same manner.  No Christians have ever suggested LoonWatch.com is an obviously anti-Christian site, right?

LoonWatch.com Loon: Spencer Is Equal To Anti-Semitic Propagandists

You can’t make it up from the loons from LoonWatch.com.  One fellow traveler of LoonWatch.com who goes by the name “Armani” wants Spencer’s JihadWatch.org site to be shut down.  Why?  Here’s an excerpt from the comment Armani made:

“It irks me that this guy is allowed to continue writing, defaming and ridiculing Muslims and their religion and the Govt. has not done anything about it.

I bet you if he was writing about Jews, Judaism and the holocaust, he would have been shut down and arrested long ago.

This is sad.”

Wait isn’t Spencer Jewish?  Isn’t Pamela Jewish?  Equaling them on the lines of David Duke when it comes to having their criticism of Islam be equaled together?  Isn’t that obviously nutty?

More Libel Against Robert Spencer

Oh yes, indeed.  LoonWatch.com is certainly quite loony.  What if let’s say some anti-Christian site were to link back to them?  What’d they have to say about it?

You Got To Be Kidding Me…

…it seems the escaped lunatics from LoonWatch.com has a site called Smearcasters listed on its blogroll. If you look at its Dirty Dozen, you’d find how how these twelve commentators are “Islamophobes” for either citing the words “Muslim fanatic” or being concern that Islam is obviously being used as a political tool to erase freedom.

By no major surprise, the group that organized it is known as Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR). Reporting? Sounds more like propaganda here. Take a look at what they have to suggest for the War on Terror.  That they’re promoting an obvious appeasement stance here.

Oh, and speaking of FAIR’s stance, here’s a comment left on the blog:

“Afghanistan has no resources? I beg to differ; Afghanistan produces 80% of the World’s opiates, that is, heroin and morphine so we are talking about huge wads of untaxed, unregulated profit. We do understand that whenever the CIA invades and occupies a country, the drug production of that country at least doubles. This is how the CIA and US Military funds their evil covert operations around the World.

We haven’t already forgotten the Iran/Contra scandal during Bush sr.’s presidency, have we? That was just the tip of the iceberg.
Does anyone seriously still believe the 9/11 story about Al-Qaeda destroying the Twin Towers? Go back and watch the footage: it’s a planned demolition.”

Sounds like FAIR has attracted some Alex Jones fans, doesn’t it seem so?  Wonder if Jones is on their payroll, along with LoonWatch.com.  Hey, I’m just asking questions here.  Wonder why does a certain Charles Johnson, a.k.a. Darth Libel still loves to link his site to these folks?

LoonWatch.com: Danios The Loon Involved In LoonWatch.com Pushes Typical Libel

Isn’t this quite the obvious?  It seems that we have an escaped loon from the mental institution here.  A certain LoonWatch.com user going by the name of Danios seems to suggest that if you have a plaque that states your family on 9/11 was murdered by terrorists whom happen to be Muslim terrorists it’s “spreading hate”.  But Danios obviously here when he scolds Andrew for trying to show some logic here obviously misses the mark:

“Andrew, you are a loon. Let me ask you, my nutty friend: Based on your logic, would it be OK for a memorial of a white suburban kid to read “murdered by black criminals?” One could then justify it by saying that it would only be racist if it read “murdered by blacks” whereas “murdered by black criminals” supposedly makes the distinction between blacks and black criminals? Anyways, there is not much point in wasting time with you on this, since only a loon could actually make the arguments you did. Your words alone are enough to make you look like a loon and I don’t think I need to actually refute them since it is self-evident to people.

I like HGG’s idea. A sign that says “killed by Al-Qaeda” would be fine.”

So here it seems that Danios is the one whom is the obvious instigating of trying to bring up race here.  Trying to suggest here that if your family were killed by criminals whom happen to be black, and you labeled on a plaque stating your family member was murdered by black criminals it’d be obviously race mongering.  But who inserted the race mongering here?  Not Andrew, Danios was the obvious one who implemented.  Funny how these “multiculturalist” Lefties like to pretend they are against hatemongering, but only if they do it to make an obvious point during a discussion.

What if your friend or family member who was murdered by those criminals happen to be black was also black too?  How’d that work out Danios?