How The Far Left Mourned The Victims Of The Fort Hood Massacre

Taking from a typical Leftist YouTuber user by the name of davidmartin7777, he openly sees anyone on the Right to being equaled to be Nazis. However, he never bothered to condemn the comments left by YouTube’s self-describe Islamic radicals whom endorsed the Fort Hood shooter and his motives.

Take for an example an obvious Islamist/Jihadi wannabe IslamInternationall whom openly endorsed another possible collaborator wannabe in the YouTube video. Then there is also the YouTuber known as TruthbHeard whom is openly shilling for the Fort Hood shooter and on YouTube he’s connected with being an obvious apologists for Palestinian terrorists. Then there is also Salaam111 whom outright justifies the terrorism that went on in Fort Hood and falsely lies on trying to suggest that all Muslim lands are being occupied by foreign forces. Even though as history serves, it was the Islamic hordes whom went and occupied non-Muslim lands and converted them all to become Islamic.

So while the far left blather about “Islamophobia” from the Right, they do not seem to really care for that much about the victims of Fort Hood.

“Widespread” Islamophobia, The Fort Hood Gunman’s Main Primary Motive

Now so typical here that LoonWatch.com has finally come out to suggest it sends its condolances to the victims of the Fort Hood massacre.  But wait…they are following an example which the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) have been following into trying to suggest there should not be any need to push any alarmist feelings of there being widespread Islamophobia.

Wait a second?  Who’s the one who’s been crying wolf here?  Last time one checked, it was LoonWatch.com and other Leftist sites affiliated with it or connectted with it that were spreading lies into trying to suggest how American Muslims/Arabs were being treated like second class citizens.  Something what the gunman was radicalized into literally believing, making it more evident he’d go on a rampage like this.  But wait!  There is no obvious widespread Islamophobia whatsoever.

Seriously, when ALL American Muslims/Arabs start seeing their property seized by the local law enforcement like what Japanese-Americans have, and placed in interment camps THEN I’d start believing you.  But since that isn’t really happening, why the hype of the fear of Islamophobia?  The pure reason why the far left promotes the hype of Islamophobia is to promtoe a divide between American Muslims/Arabs into making them believe that they ARE being lowered to the level of second class citizens.  Why should a Muslim American/Arab be upset over terms such as “Muslim terrorist”, “Islamo-Fascist” and other terms like that?

There are similar terms being used against Christian fundelmentalists when it warrents it, but you don’t see that many Christians being this upset.  Now certainly, is this a case of crying wolf here?

LoonWatch.com Loons Being Silent Over Recent Shooting In Texas?

Why the long faces of silence LoonWatch.com?  One wonders if it seems the Left’s push and crying wolf over Islamophobia has certainly led to radicalize Muslim Americans to literally make them believe their own government is out to literally get them.

Apparently, these Leftists haven’t read history.  Japanese-Americans during World War II had their own property being taken away, placed in internment camps and also other Asians were also put on the same level as being second class citizens, though they didn’t have their property being taken away or being put in internment camps.  They were likely stereotyped because they were different.

But here, here it seems it’s obviously the other way around here.  Leftists like those from the loons of LoonWatch.com don’t seem to care to hype about there being obvious Islamophobia, making many Muslim Americans believe that even one hint of criticism of Islam you’re an Islamophobe.  Even while the same hypocrites get to criticize Christianity in the same manner.  No Christians have ever suggested LoonWatch.com is an obviously anti-Christian site, right?

LoonWatch.com Loon: Spencer Is Equal To Anti-Semitic Propagandists

You can’t make it up from the loons from LoonWatch.com.  One fellow traveler of LoonWatch.com who goes by the name “Armani” wants Spencer’s JihadWatch.org site to be shut down.  Why?  Here’s an excerpt from the comment Armani made:

“It irks me that this guy is allowed to continue writing, defaming and ridiculing Muslims and their religion and the Govt. has not done anything about it.

I bet you if he was writing about Jews, Judaism and the holocaust, he would have been shut down and arrested long ago.

This is sad.”

Wait isn’t Spencer Jewish?  Isn’t Pamela Jewish?  Equaling them on the lines of David Duke when it comes to having their criticism of Islam be equaled together?  Isn’t that obviously nutty?

“Anarchists” Want The Taliban And Al-Qaeda To Win In Afghanistan

It’s no wonder why they desire the USA and its allied forces to loose the war there.

More Libel Against Robert Spencer

Oh yes, indeed.  LoonWatch.com is certainly quite loony.  What if let’s say some anti-Christian site were to link back to them?  What’d they have to say about it?

You Got To Be Kidding Me…

…it seems the escaped lunatics from LoonWatch.com has a site called Smearcasters listed on its blogroll. If you look at its Dirty Dozen, you’d find how how these twelve commentators are “Islamophobes” for either citing the words “Muslim fanatic” or being concern that Islam is obviously being used as a political tool to erase freedom.

By no major surprise, the group that organized it is known as Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR). Reporting? Sounds more like propaganda here. Take a look at what they have to suggest for the War on Terror.  That they’re promoting an obvious appeasement stance here.

Oh, and speaking of FAIR’s stance, here’s a comment left on the blog:

“Afghanistan has no resources? I beg to differ; Afghanistan produces 80% of the World’s opiates, that is, heroin and morphine so we are talking about huge wads of untaxed, unregulated profit. We do understand that whenever the CIA invades and occupies a country, the drug production of that country at least doubles. This is how the CIA and US Military funds their evil covert operations around the World.

We haven’t already forgotten the Iran/Contra scandal during Bush sr.’s presidency, have we? That was just the tip of the iceberg.
Does anyone seriously still believe the 9/11 story about Al-Qaeda destroying the Twin Towers? Go back and watch the footage: it’s a planned demolition.”

Sounds like FAIR has attracted some Alex Jones fans, doesn’t it seem so?  Wonder if Jones is on their payroll, along with LoonWatch.com.  Hey, I’m just asking questions here.  Wonder why does a certain Charles Johnson, a.k.a. Darth Libel still loves to link his site to these folks?

LoonWatch.com: Danios The Loon Involved In LoonWatch.com Pushes Typical Libel

Isn’t this quite the obvious?  It seems that we have an escaped loon from the mental institution here.  A certain LoonWatch.com user going by the name of Danios seems to suggest that if you have a plaque that states your family on 9/11 was murdered by terrorists whom happen to be Muslim terrorists it’s “spreading hate”.  But Danios obviously here when he scolds Andrew for trying to show some logic here obviously misses the mark:

“Andrew, you are a loon. Let me ask you, my nutty friend: Based on your logic, would it be OK for a memorial of a white suburban kid to read “murdered by black criminals?” One could then justify it by saying that it would only be racist if it read “murdered by blacks” whereas “murdered by black criminals” supposedly makes the distinction between blacks and black criminals? Anyways, there is not much point in wasting time with you on this, since only a loon could actually make the arguments you did. Your words alone are enough to make you look like a loon and I don’t think I need to actually refute them since it is self-evident to people.

I like HGG’s idea. A sign that says “killed by Al-Qaeda” would be fine.”

So here it seems that Danios is the one whom is the obvious instigating of trying to bring up race here.  Trying to suggest here that if your family were killed by criminals whom happen to be black, and you labeled on a plaque stating your family member was murdered by black criminals it’d be obviously race mongering.  But who inserted the race mongering here?  Not Andrew, Danios was the obvious one who implemented.  Funny how these “multiculturalist” Lefties like to pretend they are against hatemongering, but only if they do it to make an obvious point during a discussion.

What if your friend or family member who was murdered by those criminals happen to be black was also black too?  How’d that work out Danios?

Crazy Lunacy From LoonWatch.com

Now they are trying to suggest that Peter Gabiel is a “bigot” when he just said the word Muslim terrorists had killed his son.  Oh how nutty could this be?

Oh, also typically enough LoonWatch.com also lies into stating it’s against bigotry too.  It only seems to care about one brand of extremists, those whom happen to be Christians.  And it’s fine that it allows its users to lump all Christians together with those sort of extremists.  But when someone suggests there are Muslim/Islamic/IslamoFascist terrorists you’re on the level of a bigot?

That’s “wonderful”, so “wonderful” these hypocrites pretend that they are against bigotry and extremist views.

“Christian” Liberty Counsel Defends Libya Jailing Homosexuals

But it seems these “Christians” are also comfortable with a state like Libya also jailing convertees from Islam to Christianity whom reside in Libya’s jails.  They spend more time defending Gaddafi jailing Libyan homosexuals than caring about Libya’s jailed Christians.

I’m sure they also defend that too.