Even when you get a nation like Venezuela heading down the road to nothing like Zimbabwe. It seems the Red Chinese are obviously practicing their form of neo-colonialism in Venezuela which is what Comrade Hugo prefers.
This time, they are helping to subsidize Venezuelan hospitals which have become government owned more likely for the reason why Comrade Hugo’s people can not afford to pay it. It seems besides Venezuela becoming a Communist state, it also has become a virtual Banana Republic.
Could the USA be heading down this road with possible unionizations of private industries?
It seems here, the Workers’ World Party is trying to take advantage of homeowners and rentees whom are in trouble in not being able to pay off what they couldn’t afford to begin with. In quite a bit of an odd way, the title of the piece of Communist propaganda tries to suggest that the Workers’ World Party is being a bit “fiscally” concern that government cannot take care of its people. Maybe the truth is government isn’t suppose to be in charge of real estate as what these unrepentent Communists hope government should be.
How the heck will they expect government to be involved in promoting a Real Estate “Czar” to ensure that every American gets a home? Even when that American can not afford it?
…and now they are accusing Republicans of being “behind” inciting mobs of where their puppets go, when they go back home from Congress or the Senate? How about the fact to these pro-spending Democrats whom are down in the polls, that it’s a bi-partisan effort that Republicans are also spending crazy too and are also worried when they come home to see their voters quite upset?
Rather, the obvious redistribution of the wealth is going to likely INCREASE poverty. Oddly enough, much of this propaganda pushed by Russia Today was happily favored by your traditional rabid Communist shills on YouTube. The only way to help those get out of poverty isn’t obvious government involvement which is what Communist and Leftist shills obviously want to happen. The free market solution is the obvious one here that should be promoted.
…the money man of the far left-George Soros obviously hates innovation. Soros is obviously calling for government intervention to solve the economic crisis. Yeah, that would work, when pigs fly.
Isn’t this so typical of the Workers’ World Party? It seems they are at it again, supporting state-run health care. On top of that, the same Communist party is endorsing the far left UNITE HERE union which closely collaborates with the Communist-controlled ALF-CIO. Recently UNITE HERE was responsible in organizing rallies in the state of Oregon, which include demanding the Oregon government to bring in more government intervention as a way to save jobs.
Even though it seems all states in the Union of the USA are strapped for cash and are holding back. Even the ones overtly controlled by left-wing state governments such as California have reversed its positions. Not because Arnold Schwarzenegger supports it, rather he has to. Speaking further about UNITE HERE, it’s quite strange why Workers’ World Party demonizes businesses, especially private ones to be “greedy”. But according to the site UNITE HERE Exposed, obvious shows that the far left union which the Workers’ World Party holds dear so much is really taking advantage of its own union members.
I’m probably sure the same speaks for their fellow travelers in the ALF-CIO and other far left unions whom are quite close to the Obama administration.
Look who’s been calling Obama a Fascist nowadays. Nope, not right-wing bloggers but rather those at the far left/Marxist/”anarchist” Indymedia.org. They now overtly display Obama’s election campaign posters to be quite Fascist, totalitarian-like. Along with also stating how Obama’s a “warmonger”. But these were the same Indymedia.org freaks whom labeled the Republican ticket of McCain-Palin to be “supported” by neo-Nazis and white supremacists.
Even though it was quite clear their campaign wasn’t endorsed at all. It’s quite funny to see Indymedia.org in this manner. Decrying Obama’s opponents during the election to be “racists” but then when he wins the election in question, they now call him a Fascist. Perhaps they’re saying he’s a Fascist because he hasn’t gone and promoted what they have hoped for the right change for the USA. That would be a likely change from the USA to the USSA. But Obama has more overtly changed the USA into the period of the Weimar Republic where mass inflation thanks to massive amount of spending and printing money from the Weimar government caused the entire nation of Germany to collapse and later be exploited by the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (Nazi Party) to take control.
Obama seems to oddly be the right fellow to set things up for the USA to end up down that road with his massive spending bills. Perhaps it may give these violent Marxist, “anarchist” members of Indymedia.org and their fellow Leftist travelers to copy what the Nazis did to Germany and take over the USA. Then, only then, they can be pleased that they brought “real” hope and change to the USA.
…it sounds like they certainly have given up their principals of being Atheists when they ignore that Obama’s hardcore supporters literally see him as the “Messiah” or how some view him as the anti-Christ. But don’t get me wrong folks, Obama seems to be too incompetent to be on that line:
You see, I say the Atheist wing of the Democratic Party that voted for Obama lost their principals in being Atheists when they only seem to complain about Republicans whom seem to overtly misuse religion. A popular left-wing Atheist site known as Positive Atheism, as a list of quotes of former President George W. Bush, and also a rabid anti-Atheist quote coming from his father over how Atheists are not patriots at all. Rather stupid comment if he certainly indeed made a comment like that. But what Atheists really are not being told about the Republican Party or any Rightist party in general, is that there are many Rightists whom just focus on fiscal responsible, and view religion as part of a social side track issue.
But here’s where things get a bit confusing for the Atheist whom voted for Obama. How can they complain about the misuse of religion by the Bush Family, from the two former President Bushes, but don’t seem to mind about this obvious abuse?
And certainly this:
And obvious authoritarian-like slogans back during the election:
Why is Positive Atheism, the site popular for left-wing Atheists fooling them into turning one cheek. But not seem to allow them to criticize Obama? Isn’t that a tad bit hypocritical here? What if either Bush President was promoted in this brand of fashion by their supporters? Why does it seem like it’s okay for this Positive Atheism site to trick Atheists to vote for someone whom obviously is ten times worse in abusing his image than his two predecessor Bush Presidents? The far left which have taken control of the Democratic Party seem to enjoy this fancy dance of lying to a targeted group that they’d like to have under their wing.
It doesn’t matter if it’s about race, they’d just say the other side’s racist. When it comes to religion, they’d obviously say that the Republican Party is “ruled” by a bunch of Christian fundelmentalists. Even though those Christian fundies whom are “right-wing” oddly promote the lite versions of the open left-wing Christian groups in the Democratic Party such as Faith-Based Initiatives and also promoting interfaith sesssions. Something which Obama endorses unrepentently. Why would Atheists want to be tricked into not voting for the Republicans, but vote for someone whom happens to be a Democrat whom would increase spending on those very programs they were brought up to condemn?
It’s outright deception on the part to get votes in quite an unholy, cruel, deceptive manner.
Here’s a little propaganda video crafted up from the far left and possible KGB/FSB front group known as the Institute for Policy Studies, a rabidly pro-Communist “think tank” based in Washington D.C., among which many cadres are known to be supporting a certain Barack Obama and his administration. Among other things, besides openly agreeing with those on the open far left, this little KGB/FSB subversive front group would agree with “Libertarians” such as those at Lewrockwell.com and other similar groups and sites to certainly decrease military spending.
Never you mind that most of their little social justice programs they happily embrace encourages massive government intervention which results in creating further debt even more than any military spending ever has. In other words, the IPS want to weaken the USA’s resolve around the world with “Libertarians” also joining in. No major surprise about this, as Lew Rockwell’s mentor Murray N. Rothbard, was an outright shill for the Communist bloc when he was alive. Sounding more like an overt Marxist masquarading to be a Libertarian and a Capitalist, Rothbard was able to push his ideas forward in efforts to divide right-wing circles.
Makes one wonder why a certain Ron Paul may agree with the foreign policy of the Institute for Policy Studies, and also why Lew acts the way he acts in allowing posts on his blog that endorse Russian aggression against Georgia during the South Ossetia War.
It seems as crazy as it may sound a certain Alan Keyes has joined the 9/11 “Truth” Movement officially making him quite the crazy he is. Trying to allude that an incompetent leader like Obama has the “ability” to pull an “inside job” 9/11 terrorist attack. Gee, how the hell is it that someone so incompetent be able to do such a thing?
Here’s the video that Keyes has become a “Truther” and walked over to the dark side:
Hopefully when the 2010 elections role around and more fiscally sound leaders are elected it’d make Keyes look like a fool.
