Remember how Bolivia’s neo-Communist wannabe tyrant Evo Morales touted himself to be a friend of the coca grower? Not only that, Morales also played the indigenous native card in trying to promote how he was “for” the original natives.
Looks like his supporters were involved with clashes with the coca farmers, for which the Bolivian natives state the farmers are hurting their heritage. Not to mention, the drug culture in Latin America which Morales is helping to subsidize also seems to be hurting them as well.
I’m no big fan of Rush Limbaugh, nor do I watch Glenn Beck as often. But it seems the Communist Party USA is running the obvious talking points of the Democratic Party which its far left wing and even Interfaith wings are promoting state-run health care. They do not seem to get the fact that it’s not government’s responsibility to run health care.
It oddly seems quite odd that the publication of the John Birch Society known as the New American is sounding more like some commentary coming from the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Lawyers Guild both on GITMO and on the new Abu Ghraib scandals. Both can be found here and here. Where in the second link, a commenter wishes to prosecute George W. Bush and Dick Cheney for war crimes, something I’m sure the ACLU and the NLG can come to agreement.
The two “legal” teams of the Communist Party USA would find themselves some odd fellow travelers in the John Birch Society. Oh, aside from that, some comments from the second link suggest that those whom do want a certain Red World Order are Atheists, even though Communism itself has warped itself into its own nefarious religion. With Marxist shills, whenever they attempt to merge Communism and let’s say Christianity together in one ugly form of interfaith, they would often refer Jesus Christ as the first socialist/Communist.
Yuck, and gross to see how the “legal” fronts of the Communist Party USA seem to have some odd fellow travelers agreeing with their talking points.
…it sounds like they certainly have given up their principals of being Atheists when they ignore that Obama’s hardcore supporters literally see him as the “Messiah” or how some view him as the anti-Christ. But don’t get me wrong folks, Obama seems to be too incompetent to be on that line:
You see, I say the Atheist wing of the Democratic Party that voted for Obama lost their principals in being Atheists when they only seem to complain about Republicans whom seem to overtly misuse religion. A popular left-wing Atheist site known as Positive Atheism, as a list of quotes of former President George W. Bush, and also a rabid anti-Atheist quote coming from his father over how Atheists are not patriots at all. Rather stupid comment if he certainly indeed made a comment like that. But what Atheists really are not being told about the Republican Party or any Rightist party in general, is that there are many Rightists whom just focus on fiscal responsible, and view religion as part of a social side track issue.
But here’s where things get a bit confusing for the Atheist whom voted for Obama. How can they complain about the misuse of religion by the Bush Family, from the two former President Bushes, but don’t seem to mind about this obvious abuse?
And certainly this:
And obvious authoritarian-like slogans back during the election:
Why is Positive Atheism, the site popular for left-wing Atheists fooling them into turning one cheek. But not seem to allow them to criticize Obama? Isn’t that a tad bit hypocritical here? What if either Bush President was promoted in this brand of fashion by their supporters? Why does it seem like it’s okay for this Positive Atheism site to trick Atheists to vote for someone whom obviously is ten times worse in abusing his image than his two predecessor Bush Presidents? The far left which have taken control of the Democratic Party seem to enjoy this fancy dance of lying to a targeted group that they’d like to have under their wing.
It doesn’t matter if it’s about race, they’d just say the other side’s racist. When it comes to religion, they’d obviously say that the Republican Party is “ruled” by a bunch of Christian fundelmentalists. Even though those Christian fundies whom are “right-wing” oddly promote the lite versions of the open left-wing Christian groups in the Democratic Party such as Faith-Based Initiatives and also promoting interfaith sesssions. Something which Obama endorses unrepentently. Why would Atheists want to be tricked into not voting for the Republicans, but vote for someone whom happens to be a Democrat whom would increase spending on those very programs they were brought up to condemn?
It’s outright deception on the part to get votes in quite an unholy, cruel, deceptive manner.
Certainly it seems like white supremacist David Duke, along with also the neo-Nazi National Alliance seem to enjoy “Jewish” groups that deny that the founders of Israel were right to claim Jewish homeland for their own. David Duke in the past has praised a certain Norman Finkelstein for his views on the holocaust along with also supporting the PLO-trained Hezbollah terrorist group. Finkelstein is also close to Marxist propagandist and anti-Semite Carlos Latuff.
Aside from that, members of the Neturei Karta were involved with fellow white supremacist radio show known as the Vanguard News Network, a media outlet for the wider neo-Nazi National Alliance group. It certainly seems like the far left whom have supported Palestinian terrorism don’t also mind cozying up to white supremacists.
It just boggles my mind here that the Communist bloc super powers can literally dismantle a gay rights parade as what recently happen in Russia. But here’s where things get a bit scary between the similarities between the USA’s social(ist) “Conservatives” and open Communists in the East. They seem to be oddly enough on the same page on most of the social issues, but also when it comes to promoting government intervention.
You see, when President George W. Bush was in power, he coined the term “compassionate Conservatism” which had nothing to do with Conservatism at all. It was merely a way to disguse Progressive issues under a socially Conservative cloak. That’s why those whom embrace this concept should really be refered as socialist “Conservatives”. The irony here is that Bush’s successor-Barack Obama wants to add more government money to “compassionate Conservative” government-run programs!
What’s the problem with the “moderate” PLO, along with Hamas literally agreeing that so-called Nakba Day should be celebrated? It’s really translated into the “Day of Catastrophe” originally coined by Soviet-trained terrorist Yasser Arafat whom endorsed the day in question. The fact that “moderate” terrorists also celebrate this “holiday” exposes that they still don’t recognize Israel’s right to exist. Rather, the entire two-state solution is just an entire big illusion.
That there’ll only be an obvious one-state solution, and it will unfortnately be done by military force against Israel to establish the state of Palestine for good which will be an Islamo-Marxist corrupt government.
Now isn’t this not too surprising. It seems the daughter of a well known Islamo-Marxist Malcolm X’s daughter Malaak Shabazz is at the U.N.-sponsored conference. Among which she is rabidly against Israel. Which something the U.N. outright supports.
Besides that, the U.N. also barred interfaith groups that had its Jewish members laud comments against Ahmadinejad’s rantings against Israel. While what should have happen was Ahmadinejad should have not been invited to the conference to begin with. But apparently to the U.N., having a bigot like Ahmadinejad whom pals around with David Duke seems to be quite fine.
Why does it seem appropiate that the Jews of Israel must live in peace with those whom wish to see their utter destruction? From JihadWatch.org which provided the video, the “Imam” in the video is a supporter of Hamas and was from the interfaith group known as Congress of Imams and Rabbis for Peace. Really how pathetic does it seem that Israel according to its rabid haters should be the only state to commit suicide to be for “peace” with those whom obviously don’t support its existance in the first place?
Now isn’t this no major surprise? It seems that a certain left-wing Charles Rangal has joined the pro-interfaith/Open Border lobby. Where Rangal has joined a local group in New York state called the New York State Interfaith Network for Immigration Reform is asking Congress to promote more pro-Open Border laws.
How typical is this that someone like Rangal would flirt with the far left?
